Saturday, 11 March 2017

River Monsters in Mackay?

Soft muddy banks are like a canvas that records the animals of the intertidal forest.  Incredibly delicate feeding patterns from fiddler crabs and fin prints from mudskippers can be perfectly preserved.  And so can the prints of much larger and more mysterious creatures.


There is no guide to animal tracks in the mangroves, and perhaps it is time to make one, but first I need to figure out what creatures are making the marks.


In the brackish headwaters of a small river near Mackay, I noticed that the tidal riverbanks were perforated with triangular pits that were the size of a man’s fist.  There were no footprints associated with the pits so this rules out birds and mud crabs.  The pits were too delicate for crocodiles.  That leaves only fish, rays and turtles.  The mud is not dug out; rather a face has been pushed into the mud judging by the raised lip of displaced mud around the pit.  A mouthful of mud seems to be gulped in.  Plugs of mud with mouth prints could be found scattered around beside the holes.  Some were ribbed, suggesting the creature’s mouth had a ribbed roof or that the mud was pushed out past grooves in the creature’s mouth.  Other plugs were curved and smooth.  The plugs of mud were as big as a cast from a human mouth would be.  


Each pit is about 10 cm long and are similar to coffee cup in volume

A 'mouth' print in the discarded plug of mud.

A smooth plug, which might represent the other lower surface of the plug.
Rarely some very unusual fin prints were found near the triangular pits. The tracks were about half a metre wide.  I suspect that these are from a different creature.

Mysterious track - sample 1 (click to enlarge)

Mysterious track - sample 2

The stream was too narrow to turn the boat and there was a good sized crocodile slide just metres away, so I did not retrieve samples.  The place was heavily pitted.  Fiddler crabs were the only obvious source of food on the riverbank.  There were present in extraordinary density and could barely be bothered to hide when I approached. 

Crocodile slide with polished belly patch and scratches from a largish croc.

The density of the pits in this are is similar to the density of fiddler crabs
Since then, I have started to see the triangular pits elsewhere.  On the tidal flats, there are also signs that fiddler crabs are on the menu.  Holes of a slightly different shape are present along with long cylindrical plugs of mud.

Round holes with fang grooves and long plugs of mud 

Whatever makes these strange marks is likely to be very hard to observe.  It is difficult to sneak up on animals in shallow waters, and the turbidity of the water makes using underwater cameras a challenge.  If you know which creature makes these tracks, please leave a comment.

Friday, 3 March 2017

Postcard from Clairview, Central Queensland

After traveling for hours through dry cattle country on Australia's national highway, suddenly encountering an uncanny light blue sea at Clairview makes a big impression. The township of Clairview is a string of houses along a beach without even a petrol station or a shop.  However, there is a caravan park where people can and should stop for a day and experience the late afternoon vista from the beer garden on the beach.

Beach at Clairview
Thirteen islands hover on the far horizon (click to enlarge)
The bright colour of the sea is from clay suspended in the water.  Huge tides slosh back and forth in the enormous and famously muddy Broad Sound which lies just to the south.  Mixing of these muddy waters with the clean blue Coral Sea creates the curious sea colour at Clairview.

Colour of the water at high tide in a mangrove creek
At low tide, sand flats stretch toward the horizon and hold the promise of interesting creatures to anyone brave enough to seek the low water mark. Large tides have a reputation for catching people unaware and sweeping them away. With that in mind, I thought I would take a look.

Stony shoals extent for hundreds of metres from tiny creek mouths
The seabed is like a wet desert. In places it has sand so fine that it flows around your feet like mud. Elsewhere, hard sand ripples form troughs that hold soupy liquid clay. Surprisingly most sandflat creatures like sand dollars and moon snails are not smothered by the sediment despite being immersed in it. Small sand crabs attack you in their crazy style of self-defense. Dugong feeding scars crisscross the sparse beds of seagrass. Sometimes there are turtle body prints in the mud.

Dugong feeding trails
Marine turtle body print
Portunus pelagicus
Baby Sand Crab on the defensive
The tide does not rush in so badly and anyone who can walk would be safe although it does gurgle as it flows over the rippled sand.

On the calmest of days the incoming tide stirs the sediments into milk
Near the beach is a sculptured layer of rock. All around the region, this concrete-like layer of rock also appears in the beds of streams both freshwater and marine. Vast areas of land in Central and Southern Queensland apparently have this rocky hardpan lurking just below the soil surface. It is an ignored geological feature as it is neither mineral or soil. The sole scientific paper I could find struggled to explain how and why the rock formed. It appears to be a relict from a past climate and is composed of aluminium and silicate compounds of similar chemistry to clay.  It is solid, contains embedded stones and is neither laterite or silcrete.

hardpan with encrusting oysters
Relict hardpan sculptured by the sea

Clairview Creek, Central Queensland
Hardpan studded with stones in the bed of the mangrove creek
The presence of this sheet of rock just below the surface makes the bush on the coastal plain struggle to survive as the shallow soils flip from very wet to very dry with the seasons. It is perhaps one of the reasons why Central Queensland has so little agriculture and so few people.  At Clairview the rock forms reefs that are encrusted with oysters. The hollowed and twisted stone shapes are strangely photogenic.

Definitely wear shoes, as every stone has a forest of oysters. The oysters grow vertically on the stone surface and colonies are like a shag pile carpet. Perhaps this orientation frustrates the oyster drills that feed on these colonies as moving over the colony that presents only sharp edges must be hard.

A small variety of oyster that stands on end.
Scattered along the coast and sometimes well out on the sand flats are small stands of mangroves. Some open stands of large trees resemble parkland.

Flock Pigeon Island lies just off-shore

Larger mangroves provide some handy shade
Clairview is a place of sand and sky and a milky sea. It offers a picturesque desolation and serenity.

Wednesday, 11 January 2017

The Rakali, Australia's answer to an Otter

A Rakali is a large semi-aquatic rodent that is Australia’s closest equivalent to an otter.  They are also commonly known as water rats, however this name bothers me as the animal is clearly different from a rat.  Recently the Australian government decided that it was time to refer to native Australian animals using aboriginal names and Rakali is the name used for this animal by the people of the Murray-Darling river system.  Rakali are present across most of Australia, along both rivers and near the sea.
A Rakali (Photo: Mike Trennery, wettropics.gov.au)
The Rakali is a major predator of crabs, particularly the larger semi-terrestrial crabs such as the crabs that live in mangroves and ghost crabs from sandy beaches.   Seeing a Rakali is very difficult as they are nocturnal and usually, they are detected by footprints.  In mangrove swamps near Cairns, it is common for the mangrove forest floor to be almost covered with foot prints, such is the scale of their activity.  I suspect that their presence is one of the reasons why mangrove crabs are mainly diurnal.  In turn Rakali might fall prey to large owls and pythons which also visit mangrove swamps.

Front feet leave star-shaped prints and back feet, long prints with webbed toes
Rakali also forage along beaches and I often see their footprints in freshly reworked sand of creek mouths.  Recently I found Rakali track on the beach at Slade Point near Mackay and decided to follow them.  The beach is almost a surf beach and is exposed to strong winds and high wind waves.  At both ends of the beach there is a rocky headland and the Rakali tracks ran along the high tide line from one headland to the other.  As the tide peaked just after dark, the Rakali must have traversed the beach whilst there were still traces of sunlight in the sky.  It is an audacious move for such a small animal to travel a 850 m distance completely exposed.  On the way across the beach, the Rakali caught and ate a ghost crab.

Remains of the ghost crab
Rakali reach approximately 1.3 kg in weight with a body length of nearly 40 cm so they are much larger than rats.   They are known to forage almost 3 km a night, however I don’t know if anyone has previously recorded them crossing of 850 m km of exposed beach in a few minutes. 

Dangerous, rogue waves often wash 10 m higher up than normal waves
Photo of Lamberts Lookout in moonlight at 8:30 pm
Lamberts Beach, which the Rakali crossed
Rakali often drown in crab and yabbi pots, particularly in freshwater.  In South Australia, net crayfish pots have been banned due to the toll they take on turtles, Rakali and Platypus.  If you want to use yabbi traps, please check on the internet how to avoid wildlife kills. Rakali may not swim as often in estuarine systems as they would be prone to attack by large fish and crocodiles.  Tides also expose their prey, so they may not have need to dive.  

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

Giant Tides and Intertidal Fauna

Central Queensland has some highest tides in Australia, with a tidal range of as much as 7 m, and I was wondering what effect such a tidal range has on the intertidal fauna. 

The rocky headlands on the Mackay Coast are spectacularly jagged with angular boulders seemingly arranged to present as many sharp angles as possible.  The way the boulders are stacked is reminiscent of the concrete the landing craft traps that were used in World War 2.  Could tsunamis or super cyclones have contributed to this artistry?  I do not know, all I know is that the boulders are shaped and arranged differently to what I have seen elsewhere.

The intertidal boulder field at Perpetua Point, Sarina is over 100 m wide. (click to zoom in)
So many of the rocks are sharply pointed
More than 100 km north at Ball Beach, fields of angular rocks surround the headland.
These complex and stable rocky landscapes should provide the perfect habitat for a wide range of intertidal fauna, but they are virtually barren.  In both the Cairns region and in the oyster growing areas of NSW, oysters are clustered in the mid to upper intertidal area but on the Mackay Coast, they are only to be found in the lower intertidal zone.  Barnacles present a similar story.  I would even suggest that this pattern extends to the small snails such as Nodilittorina which graze on the algal crust on the surface of boulders.  Usually, these small snails are present is such numbers that it is hard not to step on them, yet in Central Queensland, one almost has to search for them.  It will not be a small undertaking to figure out why this apparent intertidal paradise is all but empty. 

Oysters and barnacles cling to the low tide line, normally they are much higher.
It is not that oysters and barnacles are not trying to colonise.  Low growing mangrove trees have barnacles and occasional oysters growing on the twigs in their canopies.  Tropical periwinkles (Planaxis sultcatus) often had small oyster shells on their shells, something I have not seen before.  Even the gravel that forms shoals in the sand flats is almost carpeted with small mostly dead oysters.  On reflection, I think that salt is what makes the rocks so hostile.  Exactly how, I do not know, but the vegetation of the headlands is cropped by the wind until it is less than ankle deep.  I think the factor that cuts the vegetation on the hills is also the factor that makes the rocks so barren below high tide level. 

At least a quarter of the periwinkes at Slade Point had dead oysters on their shells
The low mangroves near the headlands are coated with barnacles (Slade Point)
Trees that are tall enough to walk under have barnacles in their canopy!
With 7 m tides, the sandy beaches are vast, being more than 150 m from the high tide mark to low tide level.   For comparison, Cairns has a 3.6 m tidal range and the beaches are about 30 m wide from vegetation line to the toe of the beach and Bribie Island near Brisbane which has a tidal range of about 2.2 m also has beaches of 30 m width.  The huge tidal range seems to fill the beach with water on a high tide and this water seeps out of the beach when the tide falls.  For a beach to be steep and narrow, swash running up the beach has to soak in, something that does not happen on beaches where water is seeping from the face of the beach, and the beach slopes in Central Queensland are very low.  A lower slope makes the beaches very wide.

You almost need wheels to get across the beach, Grasstree Beach near Sarina.
One of my interests are the filter feeders of the swash zone.  While I have only briefly looked at Central Queensland beaches, it seems that the filter feeders are almost absent.  A walk along the high tide line reveals very few wedge shells, which are the most common filter feeder in northern Australia.  My guess is that the rough choppy seas and huge tides combine to create an environment where the tidal migration that swash zone creatures need to undertake become impossible.  Filter feeding animals are present in the surf beaches of Southern Queensland, but surf is gentle on beaches in comparison to large chop.

Almost no bivalve shells are present in the tide line but pebbles are abundant (East Point)
At low tide, most of Grasstree Beach at Sarina is carpeted with the round balls made by sand bubbler crabs.  However, the upper part of the intertidal range seems to belong to insects not crabs.  The insects are almost invisible as they have excellent vision and tend to flee from people before we get close enough to see them.  Sometimes I see the shadow of flying insects more easily than the insect.  It is strange to share a place where our vision is excellent and visibility is great, yet there are creatures that can see you perfectly well but you can’t see them.  Shorebirds including seagulls somehow feed on these creatures which is frustrating when you cannot see anything.

Billions of tiny balls carpet the beach at low tide thanks to sand bubbler crabs
Sand bubbler crabs look like sand balls but seagulls still find them and eat them
On some beaches, tiger beetles run around at high speed to battle with other tiger beetles or prey on smaller creatures.  Tiger beetles flee from us and it is quite hard to get any closer than about 2 m.  I suspect the tiger beetles are preying on midges or sandflies.  On looking for these tiger beetles on the net, I discovered that the beach tiger beetle of the North American Atlantic coast looks very similar.  The North American tiger beetle in now an endangered species and there is an interesting story about how a once common species is now on the brink.  For me, it is vindication that the time I invest in understanding creatures that no one else notices is worth something.  
Tiger beetles mating on Grasstree Beach
The smooth wet zone belongs to the tiger beetles and the rest to the sand bubbler crabs
To see how different Central Queensland is from Far North Queensland, see links below:

Saturday, 12 November 2016

Baby Mole Crabs

My observations sometimes form the main on-line documentation of some species and the mole crab (Albunea symmysta) is one of those.  Today, I was standing on Holloways Beach near Cairns, North Queensland, Australia when I started seeing little split pea-sized creatures zipping at speed across the wet sand after each wave.  They would dive into the sand a moment before it dried.   Within a fraction of a second after the swash had retreated leaving only wet sand between waves, they were moving 15-20 cm directly across the face of the beach (sideways, not up or down) and always to the north which was against the direction of the littoral drift.  I would see one every few waves and occasionally I would see a few moving at a time, perhaps 50 in 5 minutes.  It took ages to catch one to see what it was as I would only just see then dive into the sand before the next wave raced in and over them.
Juvenile mole crab ~5 mm long, probably Hippa pacifica (click image to enlarge)

Ventral surface of same crab showing spear shaped tail tucked between claw-like legs
Mole crabs filter feed with their antennae so are very strange crabs. Not much is known about them.

I was seeing the baby mole crabs near the peak of a king tide, both in the morning at about 7-8:30 am and again about 5:30 pm.  I have not looked at other times.  This is perhaps only the second time I have seen them in 30 years of scanning the beach for interesting things.  The weather was almost still in the morning and a 10 knot breeze produced a small chop that was crashing on the beach in the evening.  Only one factor was unusual, the beach had a small erosion scarp that was being attacked by the waves and creatures of the swash zone may have been trying not to be buried by the sand washing down from the scarp.

These observations help to fill in part of the life cycle of this most elusive animal and if anyone can add to these observations, feel free to comment.   I am not sure of the species but Albunea symmysta is the only mole crab I know to be present in the local environment and Hippa pacifica occurs on Lizard Island to the north.  Mole crabs are also in Indonesia and in India, however most of the information from these countries is on how to catch them or cook them.  The crab in the photos was released alive.  A video taken in California of a different species provides an idea of what juvenile mole crabs are like in the field.

Sunday, 30 October 2016

Pilot fish and Longtoms

Pilot fish famously follow sharks around, however it seems that this relationship is repeated on a smaller scale. I observed a longtom (also known as a needlefish) about 40 cm long hunting in the surface waters beside the Cairns waterfront boardwalk.  Then I saw that the longtom was not alone, it had a group of tiny fish following its every move.  Longtom are predators on other fish so following a longtom would seem to be risky for a little fish.   Additionally the longtom would zip a few metres forward to chase prey which I did not see and must have left the little fish behind.  Moments later, the little fish would be escorting the longtom again. 

Close-up of the fish escorting the longtom (click to enlarge)
The longtom appears to belong to the genus Tylosurus and I am not sure what the smaller fish are, possibly something in the tuna/trevally family.  Larger longtom occasionally spear people including sea kayakers as the sprint across the surface bouncing every six metres or so.  They tailwalk to pick up speed and will travel 20 m with only the tip of their tail in the water, the rest of their body in the air and leaning forwards at quite an angle.  Longtoms also apparently lack stomachs, something which I just found out. 
Longtom have a long beak filled with sharp teeth for catching little fish

The little fish would sometime be on top of the longtom


Wednesday, 21 September 2016

Australia's Spurred Mangroves (Ceriops sp.)

Spurred mangroves probably account for at least one third of all mangroves in northern Australia.  They form extensive pure stands on higher and drier parts of the tidal range yet most people have probably never ever seen them as there are few places where these mangroves can be seen without entering the mangrove forest.  The name 'spurred mangroves' is from the buttress roots at the base of the trunk which foresters refer to as spurs. 

Spurred mangrove forests are highly visual - click to enlarge
In Australia, there are three species of spurred mangroves, which even experienced botanists can struggle to distinguish.  It seems crazy that nobody has written a clear guide to identifying these species based on bark and leaves so this post will provide one.  I will also provide some insights into how plants are classified which import for understanding botany.  Identifying species correctly is the first stage in understanding ecosystem ecology and that is why it is important to know one species from another.

The laws of ecology act in a way that forces very similar species apart so there should be observable differences between species.  If the species are too similar they will compete directly with each other so it pays for both species to evolve differences that reduce the level of competition.  Botanists are usually incredibly good at finding these small differences.

However finding differences is only the first part of the puzzle.  Identifying plants is based on comparing specimens of plants to official reference specimens, so even if you are very good at distinguishing species in the forest, unless you have a means of comparing the plants you have observed with reference specimens, it is hard to be certain what they are.  Photo in books usually do show the parts that are needed to make a rigorous identification clearly.  Books also tend to show only perfect specimens so identifying plants that are in a different stage of the life cycle or which have been damaged by drought or flood can be difficult.  Professional botanists have to be able to identify plants in any condition and from spent flowers as well as new flowers.  Photos on the net which have been uploaded by professional botanists often provide good detail and cover the full range of what a plant can look like.  Written descriptions of the differences between species also help point out what to look for as the key features may not be obvious.    

Below is a list of differences that I have found between the species in the Barron River delta.  Before stating that a feature is a reliable means for identification, I need to study the plant across its entire range.  As I cannot do this, this list will need to be confirmed by you for mangroves in your area. Sometimes the features that I have associated with a species also appear to occur on a few individuals of another species (on very close inspection, these features are still slightly different), so I recommend using more than one feature for identification.  Also, the environment sometimes influences which features are displayed.  Near Port Douglas, there is a Ceriops forest where the forest floor is thick with pneumatophores but only 50 km away in the Barron River delta, the same species in a similar landscape position produces very few or no pneumatophores.

Spurred mangroves belong to the genus Ceriops and are also called yellow-leaved mangroves or yellow mangroves as the most common species has yellow-green leaves.  They belong to the family Rhizophoraceae which includes stilt mangroves (Rhizophora species).  To save space, the word Ceriops is abbreviated to the letter C.  Ceriops australis used to be classified as C. tagal var. australis and C. tagal var. tagal.  Var is short for variety.  However on investigation, it was found that the varieties were reproductively isolated (can't cross pollinate to produce fertile progeny), and were therefore separate species.  As the two species were once regarded as varieties of one species, this has made a mess of distribution maps which show C. tagal occurring as far south as Brisbane.  When a species is split up, records cannot be automatically updated as each record or specimen has to be re-examined to work out which of the revised species it should to be assigned to.  It takes a long time for everyone to catch up with the current classification and often some people will use the old name and others then new.  In a similar way C. pseudodecandra used to be C. decandra, however someone showed that the mangroves in South East Asia are different from the ones in Northern Australia so the Australian species was renamed to C. pseudodecandra.

Queensland Distribution
C. australis – north of Brisbane;
C. pseudodecandra – north of Ingham;
C. tagal – north of Mackay.

Primary Identification Features
Hypocotyls and fruit are one of the most reliable means for distinguishing the species and should be used whenever there is any doubt.  A hypocotyl is the mangrove dropper which falls out of the fruit on maturity.  It is actually a large but partially developed seedling.

Ceriops fruit with very young hypcotyls.
left-C. pseudodecandra, right C. australis  below C. tagal
Mature hypocotyls are much larger and may have collars at the top (C. tagal)
Fruit (brown objects)
C. australis – a compact heart-shaped fruit under a star formed from yellow sepals;
C. pseudodecandra – a brown fruit with sepals attached part way down the fruit;
C. tagal – a long windsock-shaped fruit, with sepals ringing the flat top of the fruit.

Hypocotyl (green objects - ones shown here have just emerged and are very small)
C. australis - a smooth dropper up to approximately 10-15cm long when mature;
C. pseudodecandra - high ridges on dropper even when small.
C. tagal - almost smooth when small, but ridged when larger, approx 20-25 cm long; 

C. pseudodecandra hypocotyls point up, whereas the other species point out from the stem or down
Flowers
Sepals, which are the covers that protect the flowers before they open and which look like thick point petals, are the most obvious feature of Ceriops flowers.  The petals of all species are white when fresh.

C. australis - dense clusters of flowers are reddish brown, sepals have little taper except at the tip;
C. pseudodecandra - small clusters of greenish flowers that are held close to stem;
C. tagal - slightly less dense clusters than C. australis and flowers are slightly larger.  Sepals are reddish with green tips and taper uniformly from base to tip.

Ceriops australis flowers - magnified
Ceriops pseudodecandra flowers
Ceriops tagal flowers
C. australis (left), C. tagal (right)
In botany, colour is the least reliable feature so always look for shape and numbers of flower parts before using colour.  

In the Barron River delta, C. tagal flowered in 2016 before C. australis flowered in general and there are also hints that flowering peaks at different times of day for each species.  Differences in flower timing might help to reproductively isolate these species.  Imagine if they could cross pollinate but infertile offspring were produced.  The cost of supporting large hypocotyls is quite high in comparison to producing seeds so there would be considerable evolutionary pressure for each species to avoid cross pollination.

Secondary Identification Features
Habitat
C. australis – makes pure stands in dry, saline areas, also occur in mixed stands;
C. pseudodecandra – in the upper part of the tidal range, mainly in non-hypersaline landward zone;
C. tagal – occurs with other mangrove species both in the landward zone and in the transition zone between C. australis stands and stilt mangrove forest. 

C. australis often forms large single species stands with open understoreys
C. tagal tends to occur in mixed species swamps (with Xylocarpus and Avicennia here).
Both C. tagal (pictured) and C. australis sometimes occur as old giants
C. pseudodecandra stands are uncommon and consist of large multi-stemmed bushes
Bark – smaller trunks 
C. australis – bark on small branches of low trees is often very smooth and salmon-coloured;
C. pseudodecandra – bark is dark and finely fissured, very similar to C. tagal but darker
C. tagal – bark on small branches is finely fissured and light brown with an oak-grain pattern. 

C. australis usually has smooth pinkish bark with fine horizontal striations
C. tagal tends to have light brown bark with fine fissures that in an 'oak-grain' pattern
Sometimes C. tagal has smooth bark but lacks the horizontal striations and has vertical brush lines
C. pseudodecandra usually has grey bark rectangular cracking
Bark – medium trunks
Medium sized trees usually have numerous lenticels.  Lenticels are the small patches of flaky bark that allow the trunk to breath.

C. australis – lenticels common and without persistent flakes of bark above and below point of eruption;
C. pseudodecandra – bark develops into tessellating grey squares approximately 1 cm in size;
C. tagal -  a flange of bark persists mainly above a row of erupted lenticels, bit like an awning.

C. australis bark remains smooth on medium sized trunks but gains white lichens and moss
C.tagal is often covered with white and orange lichens
Some large C. tagal and possibly C. australis are covered with so many lenticels, that their bark looks black
Bark – larger trunks
C. australis and C.tagal both develop rough bark covered with black squares.  It is really had to tell the species of large trees by bark alone.  C. australis seems to get more clusters of coral like roots dangling from the elbows of granddaddy trees.  C. pseudodecandra does not get that big.

Old C.tagal and C. australis can develop rough bark which can be dark and irregular or covered with light blocks
C. pseudodecandra does not get large but clumps expand into rings with time
Buttresses and pneumatophores
C. australis – very rarely has pneumatophores, tops of spur roots are about as wide as a ladies finger;
C. pseudodecandra – buttress roots are relatively small and I have not observed pneumatophores;
C. tagal – usually has some pneumatophores but these are hard to identify as it often occurs with species that can produce similar pneumatophores.  

C. australis often has smooth bark on the spur roots and the spurs are narrow
C. tagal has darker bark on the spur roots which are broader when seen from above
C. tagal sometimes has lots of serpent-like breathing roots but usually has very few
C. pseudodecandra has poorly developed spurs but the bark is similar to C. tagal.
Most C. pseudodecandra clumps have dead timbers poking up in the centre
Basal bark
The bark of of the spur roots or base of trunk is the easiest way I have found for distinguishing Ceriops species.

C. australis - spur roots are usually covered with smooth bark in larger individuals and in light brown loose flaky bark in advanced seedlings/small saplings
C. pseudodecandra - bark is non-descript but shoots usually rise from tree bases of living trunks.
C. tagal - tops of spur roots are usually two fingers wide and the bark on the tops of the roots has often split to form a roof that shades the sides of the roots.  Rough dark chocolate-coloured flakes of bark often cover the trunk between the spurs and on the faces of the spurs.

The bark on top of C. tagal spurs spreads out like a roof over the spur
Shaggy flakes of chocolate brown bark often cover the faces of the spur roots
C. australis has either smooth bark on the spurs or the bark spits at the top, rather than forming a roof
If bark is flaky, it is pinkish-brown as seen above.
Saplings of C. australis (left) and C. tagal (right)
Some C. australis can be flaky around the base but the 'roof ' is not well formed and the colour is lighter
C. pseudodecandra often has twigs risking up from the bottom.
The dark material at the bottom is mud thrown up from rain spatter.
Seedlings and leaves

In this guide, I have not covered any of the similar mangroves from other genera that share habitat with Ceriops.  With all Ceriops, the new shoot is like a small flattened spear tip, so check for this feature first. 

C. australis – seedlings occur in large numbers around the margins of stands, leaves tend to be held erect in bright areas and partially erect when seedlings are in the understorey.  Only in dark area are leave horizontal.  Even small seedlings had flowers in September.  Leaf stalks are green and leaf blades taper down to the leaf stalk.

C. pseudodecandra – leaves are far narrower and longer than other species and veins are hard to see in upper surface which has a mat finish.  New leaves are dark red and leaf stalks are a very dark purple-red.  Seedlings are quite hard to find and possibly occur in only small numbers;

C. tagal – seedlings are common in shady parts of the landward zone and have large horizontal almost round (elliptical leaves) and lateral veins create a texture in the upper leaf surface that can be seen in leaves are held an angle that reflects the surface shine.  Leaf stalks are a dark rusty colour. 

C. australis shade leaves have green stalks and the base of the leaf blade is tapered
It there is any direct sunlight during the day, the leaves are raised into an erect posture
C. pseudodecandra has long leaves which are purplish when new
C. pseudodecandra leaves are on long stalks and leaves are not tightly clustered to avoid self-shading
Red new leaves of C. pseudodecandra
C. tagal seedling leaves are roundly elliptical and have brown stalks
C. pseudodecandra seedling leaf (left) and C. tagal seedling leaf (right)
Ecology

Ecology is often dominated by factors that cannot be seen so my understanding which comes from viewing Ceriops in a wide variety of landscape is preliminary only.  Crab predation on hypocotyls is an example of a hidden factor that controls the distribution of many mangrove species.

C. australis seems to be a hypersaline area and bright light specialist.  It raises its leaves into the erect position even in partial shade.  This may explain why seedlings of this species are usually clustered around the edges of salt pans and not in the understorey of the mature stands.  This is not how forests normally regenerate (gap dynamics) and is worth of more study.


C. tagal is a typical mangrove competing for prime habitat with many other species.  It has shade tolerant seedlings and is possibly competitive due to not investing heavily in pneumatophores in the way that its competitors do.  As a result, it is usually restricted to the more freely draining areas.

C. pseudodecandra usually belongs to the shady middle storey of tall mangrove forests in the landward zone.  It is a shade tolerant multi-stemmed woody shrub which resembles a larger version of the river mangrove (Aegiceras corniculatum).  I only found very few seedlings and I suspect that this species lives a very long slow life and only very occasionally reproduces successfully.  It can take hundreds of years for a clump to form a ring, yet for this species rings are common.

Final comments
For years I have been stomping around in the swamp and not correctly identifying these species and so have a number of other botanists, so the time is right to prepare a guide.  C. pseudodendra is a candidate for the ugliest mangrove is existence with its scrappy form and collection of dead trunks jutting out of the mud like punji sticks, so I probably though it was a malform example of another species and kept on going.  With C. australis and C. tagal, it was only when I found a stand of one species next to a stand of the other that I suddenly realised how different they really are.

Referenences



Reevaluating the taxonomic status of Ceriops australis (Rhizophoraceae) based on morphological and molecular evidence in Botanical Studies (2009) 50: 89-100